Mark Koberlein

for everything there is a reason 

Could the success of the iPad mean the beginning of the end for Flash?

I have mixed feelings about the iPad.  I love my iPhone, Kindle and my HP Netbook but I'm not sure if I have a need for another small computing device. Of course, who couldn't use a huge iPod Touch to have on the coffee table to check email and Facebook statuses. I could see replacing my Kindle with one because I'm sure that it is going to be a better book reader. However, I'm not paying $500 to $700 for a book reader.  I waited until the Kindle came down to $250 before I pulled the trigger on that. 

I do have a feeling that the iPad will be successful because the mac boys and tech heads will flock to it. It will be the next must have gadget. I also see this device becoming very popular in educational circles.  If it gains a lot of traction in these markets then I assume the mass market will eventually follow unless a competitor like HP or Dell can deliver comparable product with a good UI and a lot of marketing.

I just read an interesting article by Steve Gillmor on TechCrunchIT and it made me think about something. If the iPad is successful does that mean the beginning of the end Flash?

Take Flash. Please. When Jobs quarantined it on the iPhone, we all felt it was a tactical thing, more political than technical. Of course, it’s never been technical, even now when it’s kept off the iPad because it is responsible for such a great percentage of crashes in Safari or whatever. Actually, Flash is being kept off the iPlatform because It Sucks. Google’s HTML 5 liturgy is another contiguous example of how to sell the same message, but enquiring minds still want to know why we need a plug-in from a company that makes its real money from Photoshop.
via http://www.techcrunchit.com/2010/01/29/left-out/ 


As a web developer, I'm not a fan of Flash. I have a lot experience working with it because of my former life as a designer, but now I try to use Javascript and CSS whenever I can to avoid using Flash.   Flash is a blotted web browser plugin and is the leading cause for web browser crashes.  It is CPU and memory intensive and on low powered devices like netbooks is barely usable. 

Flash is still installed on over 98% of the web browsers and I believe the primary reason it retains it's foothold is because of video sites like Youtube and Hulu that are built on on it. Video is Flash's killer feature.  Also, there a Flash games like Facebook's Farmville that help to keep it on top. However, more and more mobile devices like smart phones don't have Flash installed and people are starting to get comfortable with the idea of not relying on Flash for their dynamic content. Also, websites are using Javascript for animations that would have required Flash to run in a browser. 

The one thing that Javscript can not do is video and that is where HTML5 will come into play. HTML5 allows video to play in a web browser using a video codec like MPEG or H.264 Youtube is already starting to move over to an HTML5 video player and most of their videos are viewable in a beta version of their site. 

So back to the iPad. Taking Steve Job's recent statements into consideration about Flash, Adobe, HTML5, Flash will probably never step foot inside of an iPhone or iPad. I bet that if Steve could, he would try to keep it off every Mac.  If the iPad becomes a successful web browsing device without Flash, then that could be the final nail in the Flash coffin.  It probably won't happen overnight because that 98% install base will take a long time to come down but I think that in 2 to 3 years we will no longer have the need for Flash in the browser. 

Like I said, I'm still undecided about whether or not a tablet device like the iPad is right for me, but if it helps to kill off Flash and speed up the adoption of HTML5 then as a web developer, I'm for it.  

Just in case you live under a rock and you don't know what the iPad is:

Loading mentions Retweet
Filed under  //   development   gadgets   technology  

Comments [2]

Google’s ‘Don’t Be Evil’ Mantra is ‘Bullshit,’ Adobe Is Lazy: Apple’s Steve Jobs


This is an amazing article on Wired with Steve Jobs opening up in public about going after Google and Adobe. 

After a big public announcement of the sort Apple had this week for the iPad CEO Steve Jobs often takes time in the day or two afterwards to have a Town Hall at One Infinite Loop, making himself available for questions from employees bold enough to stand up and take one right between the eyes.

This time, the big topics included Google and Adobe — no surprises there. Google recently unveiled its own Android-powered handset, the Nexus One, whose release Jan. 5 prompted Jobs to perhaps over-react by announcing on the same day that the iTunes store had served up three billion apps and that “… we see no signs of the competition catching up any time soon.” Apple’s billionth iPhone app download was greeted with great fanfare, but the two billionth not so much, so it felt a tad like Jobs was feeling some heat.

And the absence of Adobe Flash support on the iPhone for three years and counting, and now on the iPad, is either celebrated by users as a poke in the eye of one of the web’s most dextrous tools, or the most over-rated and overused crutch for decent design.

Jobs, characteristically, did not mince words as he spoke to the assembled, according to a person who was there who could not be named because this person is not authorized by Apple to speak with the press.

On Google: We did not enter the search business, Jobs said. They entered the phone business. Make no mistake they want to kill the iPhone. We won’t let them, he says. Someone else asks something on a different topic, but there’s no getting Jobs off this rant. I want to go back to that other question first and say one more thing, he says. This don’t be evil mantra: “It’s bullshit.” Audience roars.

You know I miss the days when Apple (as in Steve) went after Microsoft and IBM with a vengeance.  That battle didn't turn out too well for him, but it was fun to watch. It would be fun to see Apple and Google go at it. 

The real battleground is the iPhone and Android phones. One one side you have a slick closed platform (iPhone) that is a single piece of hardware controlled by Apple. On the other side you have an open platform (Google's Android) that can run an infinite number of mobile devices that are not controlled by Google. The history of the PC vs. Mac wars showed us that an open platform (as in able to be installed on any non-apple device) wins over a closed platform controlled by one company. It will be interested to see what happens this time around. 
 
About Adobe: They are lazy, Jobs says. They have all this potential to do interesting things but they just refuse to do it. They don’t do anything with the approaches that Apple is taking, like Carbon. Apple does not support Flash because it is so buggy, he says. Whenever a Mac crashes more often than not it’s because of Flash. No one will be using Flash, he says. The world is moving to HTML5.

While I would heartily agree with Steve that HTML5 is the future the world is moving away from Flash, I don't think he should start rocking the boat too much because if Adobe really wanted to stick it to Apple they could stop releasing Photoshop on the Mac and just release it for Windows and Linux.  If this would happen, you probably see a large portion of the creative and educational markets move away from Apple. This is a hammer that Adobe has always had over Apple but used it because it didn't make financial sense to them. 
 

The world, of course, includes Google, which last week in a somewhat more modest development bypassed Apple’s iPhone app blockade by unveiling an html5 version of Google Voice, which takes full advantage of mobile Safari on the iPhone. Wired.com found it to be an impressive variation of the app Apple has neither approved nor officially rejected.

And it is, of course, in keeping with Google’s stated view (Android app marketplace notwithstanding) that the future is really in web-based applications and not in mobile apps at all. Web-based applications of the sort html5 makes much more viable.

So, great work rallying the troops, Steve — but be careful what you wish for.

via. http://www.wired.com/epicenter/2010/01/googles-dont-be-evil-mantra-is-bullshit-adobe-is-lazy-apples-steve-jobs/#ixzz0eAH4tDef

Loading mentions Retweet

Comments [0]

Lost Seasons 1-5 Recapped in 8 Minutes 15 Seconds

In case you missed anything or just confused about what's going on before the last season.

Loading mentions Retweet

Comments [0]

An out of prison, rags to riches story with Gordon Gekko in Wall Street 2 ..... I'm in

</object>

Fun doesn't necessarily convey plot though, so here's a quick rundown. It's 2008 and Gordon Gekko has just been released from jail. There's definitely a bit of culture shock, but Gekko is still a money whisperer and can tell which way the financial winds are blowing -- towards a stock market crash. 
 
Unfortunately, no one will listen to his warnings, so he finally gets help from his estranged daughter's (Carey Mulligan) fiance Jacob (Shia LaBeouf), who is looking for revenge after his mentor was killed.   
 
via http://blog.zap2it.com/frominsidethebox/2010/01/wall-street-2-trailer-gordon-gekko-is-back.html

Sounds like Gekko is going to be the good guy this time in Wall Street 2. As long as he is still acting like the greedy bad-ass money maker that he used to be then I'm in. 

Loading mentions Retweet

Comments [0]

Will Apple's new iPad bring about the social acceptance of the Man Purse? If it does, then I'm buying one.


You have to have a bag to carry it around and it looks like the Man Purse is already the "must-have" accessory in Hollywood.

         
Click here to download:
Will_Apples_new_iPad_bring_abo.zip (114 KB)

After looking at these photos, I just realized that I'm already carrying one for the past couple of months. I think my netbook sleeve might qualify as one.  Well, at least I have something in common with Jack Bauer.

 

 

Loading mentions Retweet
Filed under  //   gadgets   technology  

Comments [0]

Amazing 360 Video from CNN of a drive through the streets of Haiti

I tried to embed this video but it didn't work. Click here to view the video on CNN's website. Make sure you click through the 3 pages on the site because there are 3 separate videos to watch.

Loading mentions Retweet
Filed under  //   news   technology  

Comments [0]

W3schools.com's Historical Browser Statistics

 

Loading mentions Retweet
Filed under  //   development  

Comments [2]

Send a $10 Donation to the Red Cross for Haiti Relief by Texting ‘Haiti’ to 90999

American Red Cross Pledges Initial $1 Million to Haiti Relief

Send a $10 Donation by Texting ‘Haiti’ to 90999

Editorial note: You can make a donation by calling 1-800-REDCROSS or 1-800-257-7575 (Spanish) or click on the Donate Now button.

National Headquarters
2025 E Street, N.W.
Washington, DC 20006
www.redcross.org

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/worldnews/article-1242929/Haiti-earthquake-pictures-How-natural-disaster-ripped-island-apart.html

The American Red Cross is sending money, supplies and staff to Haiti to support relief efforts there after yesterday’s earthquake, which caused catastrophic damage and loss of life.

According to reports, as many as three million people may have been affected by the quake, which collapsed government buildings and caused major damage to hospitals in the area. 

The Red Cross is contributing an initial $1 million from the International Response Fund to support the relief operation, and has opened its warehouse in Panama to provide tarps, mosquito nets and cooking sets for approximately 5,000 families.

via. Red Cross Website
http://www.redcross.org/portal/site/en/menuitem.94aae335470e233f6cf911df43181aa0/?vgnextoid=15c0c5a210826210VgnVCM10000089f0870aRCRD

$1.2 Million in Donations for Haiti, via Text Message

Update | 6:51 p.m. Adding more information about the campaign and updating the total raised.

In the aftermath of the devastating earthquake that struck Haiti on Tuesday, thousands of Americans are sending financial support — through their mobile phones.

Anyone with a mobile phone and an account with a major wireless carrier can text the phrase “Haiti” to the number 90999 and donate $10 to the Red Cross. That amount is charged to the donor’s cellphone bill.

The texted donations are being handled by a company called mGive, which started the campaign in a joint effort with the State Department and the Red Cross late Tuesday night. Thanks to a mention on the White House’s blog and lots of word of mouth onTwitter and Facebook, the campaign had raised more than $1.2 million by Tuesday evening, mGive said. 

Loading mentions Retweet

Comments [0]

I love that Google is standing up to China by taking down the search wall. Too bad China owns all of our debt.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/worldnews/article-1242927/Google-US-China-diplomatic-collision-course-internet-censorship-row.html

http://reflectionof.me/where-is-americas-debt-0

   
Click here to download:
I_love_that_Google_is_standing.zip (486 KB)

Loading mentions Retweet
Filed under  //   news   politics   technology  

Comments [0]

Living a life of purpose or finding purpose by living your life?


I follow Rick Warren on Twitter because he appears to be the leading evangelical pastor in America. He recently made some comments that made me think and tonight I found a video of a Ted talk he gave about his ministry and his book: The Purpose Driven Life. I also found a video of Dan Dennett giving a rebuttal of some of the assertions that Rick made in his book. 

Rick Warren and Dan Dennett would probably agree that we are biologically hard wired to pursue a certain path in our lives.  In other words, finding our purpose in life. 

Rick says that purpose comes from our Creator and Dan might say that since there is no Creator we find purpose in life through living our lives. 

Rick Warren: Living a life of purpose

Dan Dennett: A secular, scientific rebuttal to Rick Warren

Loading mentions Retweet
Filed under  //   religion  

Comments [0]